These are some 100% crops of ISO speed comparison tests illustrating the noise as the ISO speed increases for the Konica Minolta A2. All tests were taken tripod mounted, with a zoom of approximately 90mm and taken at f/5.6. Pictures were taken using the highest quality JPEG mode of each camera. Exposures were fairly long, around 3.2 seconds for the ISO 64 pictures and correspondingly shorter as the ISO speed was increased.
I performed two Neat Image tests:
Minolta A2, ISO 64, Original Crop
|
Minolta A2, ISO 64, Neat Image Default
|
Minolta A2, ISO 64 Neat Image A2 Aggressive
|
Minolta A2, ISO 100, Original Crop
|
Minolta A2, ISO 100, Neat Image Default
|
Minolta A2, ISO 100, Neat Image A2 Aggressive
|
Minolta A2, ISO 200, Original Crop
|
Minolta A2, ISO 200, Neat Image Default
|
Minolta A2, ISO 200, Neat Image A2 Aggressive
|
Minolta A2, ISO 400, Original Crop
|
Minolta A2, ISO 400, Neat Image Default
|
Minolta A2, ISO 400, Neat Image A2 Aggressive
|
Minolta A2, ISO 800, Original Crop
|
Minolta A2, ISO 800, Neat Image Default
|
Minolta A2, ISO 800, Neat Image A2 Aggressive
|
Minolta A2, ISO 64, Hard Sharpening in camera, Original Crop
|
Minolta A2, ISO 64, Hard Sharpening in camera, Neat Image Default
|
Minolta A2, ISO 64, Hard Sharpening in camera, Neat Image A2 Aggressive
|
I find that Neat Image v4.0's default noise reduction was too conservative. For really clean looking images, you need to set the filtering settings with more aggressive noise filtering. This produces extremely clean images at ISO 64, 100, and 200. At ISO 400, the cleaned images are useable, though they noticeably suffer from loss of sharpness and detail. Probably some sharpening could be done to improve the images. At ISO 800, however, noise filtering noticeably degrades the image details. To get good results at ISO 800, expect to spend some time doing additional manual tuning and sharpening, and even then, your images will likely lose some detail.